Strategy Clarity Sprint
A four-week focused engagement. Ruth reviews your current direction, interviews key…
From £2,400Silent Anchor Hub is a one-person consultancy helping small teams and founders think more clearly, make better decisions, and stop running the same meeting twice. Run by Ruth Padgett since 2019, mostly on strong tea and stubbornness.
A four-week focused engagement. Ruth reviews your current direction, interviews key…
From £2,400Up to six hours of Ruth's time per month, used however is most useful: calls, written…
£950/monthHalf-day or full-day working sessions for teams of four to twelve. Ruth designs the…
From £1,200/dayA single ninety-minute call. Ruth reads whatever you send her beforehand and comes…
£280Steady work. Honest advice. No theatre
Ruth Padgett left a comfortable operations director role in spring 2019 because she kept noticing the same pattern: smart people in good organisations making slow, painful decisions because nobody had created the…
Meet the teamDrop Ruth a message. She will read it herself and reply within two business days.
If a plan needs forty slides to explain, it is not a plan yet. Ruth works with you until the core logic fits on a single sheet of paper, then you both know it is real.
Most teams do not lack information. They lack a clear way to weigh it. Ruth brings a structured but low-jargon process for getting to a decision and sticking with it.
Ruth has no stake in your internal politics. That is the point. She will say the thing the room has been avoiding, politely but plainly.
Engagements do not end with a document. Ruth stays in contact through implementation, available for short calls when things get wobbly.
Ruth has worked with enough founders to notice a pattern. The hard decision is almost never the one they describe in the first email. It is usually one layer underneath, and the reason it has not been made is not lack of information. It is something more uncomfortable than that.
Read more →Ruth has facilitated a lot of strategy days. Some of them were genuinely useful. Some produced a wall of Post-it notes that nobody looked at again after the train home. The difference between the two is almost never the quality of the people in the room. It is almost always the quality of the preparation and the structure.
Read more →Ruth has been in advisory relationships that worked well and ones that quietly stopped being useful without either party quite acknowledging it. The difference is usually not chemistry or expertise. It is structure, and specifically whether both parties are honest about what they need from the relationship at each stage.
Read more →